Flooring takeoff reviewIn development
Takeoff review, with the evidence in view.
OptiView is being built for flooring contractors and preconstruction teams that need a clearer way to review quantities, resolve scope questions and track corrections. The goal is a connected review process with people responsible for the decisions.
The review problem
The quantity is only part of the review
A takeoff records quantities and materials from project drawings. Reviewing it requires context. Which drawing revision applies? Does the scope match the materials and areas shown? Was the correction actually resolved? When that information is spread across files, trackers and messages, reviewers have to reconstruct the story before they can decide what comes next.
OptiView’s first focus is that review process: making the evidence, questions and decisions easier to follow.
Review priorities
What the review is built around
01
Evidence in context
The planned review experience connects quantity and scope questions with the relevant source evidence, so a reviewer can see why an item needs attention.
02
Corrections you can follow
The intended correction history keeps the original finding, returned work and reviewer’s verification connected across versions.
03
People own approval
Reviewers resolve uncertainty. An authorized senior reviewer decides whether the reviewed version can be approved. An automated check does not make that decision.
Sequence
The intended workflow
Step 01
Confirm the package and scope.
Step 02
Review supported takeoff evidence.
Step 03
Record questions with context.
Step 04
Request and verify corrections.
Step 05
Approve the reviewed version.
Who it’s for
Built around flooring preconstruction
For estimating and preconstruction teams reviewing recurring takeoff work, coordinators managing returned packages, and senior reviewers responsible for engineering signoff. OptiView is being designed to support the review around your team’s existing takeoff authoring process.
Field / commercial fit-outExample
One finding, in context
Illustrative example using fictional project information
Source reference
Sheet A-201 • Room 102 • Revision B
Finding
The scope note and drawing legend list different base finishes. Confirm the governing requirement before accepting this item.
Next action: Reviewer requests clarification and a corrected takeoff entry.
Correction sequence
- 1Finding recorded
- 2Correction returned
- 3Reviewer verifies
- 4Senior decision on the reviewed version
The example shows the intended review structure, not a live customer project or automated accuracy result.
FAQ
Key questions
Short answers, in plain terms. The full list sits with the contact page so you can act on them straight away.
Start the conversation
Show us where your reviews get stuck
Tell us how you review takeoffs, which tools you use and where corrections slow you down. Let’s discuss whether OptiView’s planned approach fits.
Early interest
Not ready for a conversation? Join the waitlist.
Leave your details and a line about your work. We’ll only reach out when OptiView opens for evaluation — no newsletter, no drip campaign.